Atiku Insists On Winning The Presidential Election

Atiku Insists On Winning The Presidential Election

The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar, in an effort to regain is alleged stolen mandate has revealed that the result from the server of the Independent National Electoral Commission reveals that he won the presidential election.

In the petition that was written to the electoral body, Atiku gave the “unique MAC address and Microsoft product ID of the INEC server” from where the results were obtained.

The commission had announced that the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress, President Muhammadu Buhari scored 15,191,847, while Atiku polled 11,262,978 votes.

However, Atiku while speaking on the result stated that the on the INEC server shows that he scored a total of 18,356,732 votes to Buhari’s 16,741,430 votes.

The former vice president claimed that the address of the server from which the results were obtained are unique to INEC.

“The Servers from which the said figures were derived belong to the first Respondent (INEC). The figures and votes were transmitted to the first Respondent’s Presidential Result’s Server 1 and thereafter aggregated in INEC_PRES_RSLT_SRV2019, whose Physical Address or unique Mac Address is 94-57-A5-DC-64-B9 with Microsoft Product ID 00252-7000000000-AA535. The above descriptions are unique to the 15t Respondent’s Server,”.

“There is no conjecture in the votes and scores in the table pleaded by the Petitioners. The figures are factual. The
Spokesperson for the 2nd Respondent’s Campaign Organization openly admitted that the data in question was in the first Respondent’s Server when he wrote and submitted a petition to the Inspector General of Police and the Director General of the Department of State Services (DSS) asking the Security agencies to investigate the 2nd Petitioner herein for allegedly hacking into the Server of the 1St Respondent and obtaining the data in question.”

“Specifically, Mr. Festus Keyamo, SAN, the Spokesperson of the 2nd Respondent claimed in the said petition that it was the first Petitioner who smuggled the data into the Server.”

The opposition part ha claimed that the INEC chairman “committed grave errors in the final collation exercise” for the election by “falsely crediting” some persons with political parties, including “Okotie Christopher, Reverend Dr. Onwubuya and Ojinika Jeff Chinze.”

“The grave errors referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 above were under the hands and signature of the first Respondent’s Chairman, (who was also the Returning Officer) in the conduct of the final collation of the results of the Presidential Election,”.

“The Petitioners state that the final results as declared by the first respondent are those that were transmitted online
to the website of the first Respondent (www” He added.